Moving is not the same as building
In short
- Moving, whether that is group classes or cardio, and building muscle are two different things. The second one needs mechanical tension, a plan and progression.
- After 40 you lose muscle mass gradually without strength training, even if you move plenty.
- Two targeted strength sessions a week alongside your existing classes is already enough to build.
I had a coaching session recently with a woman in her early sixties. She had changed the way she ate and had genuinely lost some weight. Doing well, then. But she said something that stayed with me:
And her own suspicion was right: she was worried she had lost more than fat, that muscle had gone too.
I asked what she was doing for exercise. The answer: group classes. Bodyshape, circuit training, bodypump. Several times a week. So she was moving plenty. And still she had begun to doubt whether it was bringing her closer to her goal.
Two different things
This is one of the biggest misunderstandings I come across: moving and building are treated as the same thing. They are not.
Group classes are valuable. You burn calories, you train your fitness, you move your body, and it is sociable. Nothing wrong with any of that, and if you enjoy it, keep going.
But building muscle asks for something else. For that you need three things:
- Mechanical tension. Your muscles have to be loaded more heavily than they are used to. Not more often, but heavier.
- A plan. The same exercises, built up deliberately, so you can measure your progress.
- Progression. A little more weight or a few more repetitions every week or two. That is the signal your body builds on.
A group class is designed for the whole group. The same weight, the same tempo, roughly the same load every week. Fine for maintenance, but your body gets no reason to become stronger.
And after 40 this really starts to bite. From then on you lose muscle mass every year unless you put something against it. Losing weight without strength training speeds that up: part of what disappears is not fat but muscle. Hence "I have lost weight but I cannot see it".
"But strength training is boring"
She said as much, and I understand it. A room full of machines is less sociable than a class with music.
But here is how I see it: doing the same thing every week and seeing no change is also boring. Strength training gets interesting the moment you start tracking progress. Last week eight repetitions at 30 kilos, this week nine. That is a game with yourself, and you win it a little every week.
The training plan misunderstanding
At the end of the conversation she hoped I would tell her which exercises to do. I get that question almost every time, and it makes sense.
But I have written out enough training plans in the past to know what happens to them: almost nobody gets a result. Not because the plans were bad, but because a plan does not solve the problem.
You can find a list of exercises in five minutes. Technique, build-up and consistency are where the real work sits. That is exactly where coaching makes the difference, and why I no longer write standalone plans.
What you can do with this yourself
Three things you can do this week without buying anything:
- Keep your group classes, but add two fixed strength sessions. It does not have to replace anything. Twice a week of targeted strength alongside your classes is enough to build.
- Pick five or six basic exercises and get a little better at them every week. Write down your weights and repetitions. What you do not track does not grow.
- Do not measure progress with the scales alone. The scales cannot tell fat from muscle. Look at what you lift, how your clothes fit, and how the stairs feel.
And if you have lost weight but cannot see it, the odds are your body is not asking for less. It is asking for heavier.
Frequently asked questions
Is moving not enough to keep my muscle mass?
Source: strength training and sarcopenia (PMC) →
How many times a week do I need to lift to build muscle?
Source: RIVM Dutch activity guideline, at least twice a week →
